Skip to content

bugzilla
bugzilla
Commit a7d40ecc authored by justdave%bugzilla.org's avatar justdave%bugzilla.org
Browse files
Options

Bug 257534: Require Perl 5.8.1 or later when running on Windows with ActiveState…

Bug 257534: Require Perl 5.8.1 or later when running on Windows with ActiveState Perl (there is no official CGI ppm build with a new enough version for Bugzilla on any earlier version of ActiveState Perl) Patch by Byron Jones <bugzilla@glob.com.au> r=justdave, a=justdave
parent 666b9d62
Hide whitespace changes
Inline Side-by-side
Showing with 791 additions and 1044 deletions
docs/en/rel_notes.txt
View file @ a7d40ecc
This source diff could not be displayed because it is too large. You can view the blob instead.
docs/en/xml/Bugzilla-Guide.xml
View file @ a7d40ecc
...@@ -30,19 +30,21 @@ ...@@ -30,19 +30,21 @@
For a devel release, simple bump bz-ver and bz-date For a devel release, simple bump bz-ver and bz-date
--> -->
<!ENTITY bz-ver "2.17.7"> <!ENTITY bz-ver "2.19">
<!ENTITY bz-nextver "2.18"> <!ENTITY bz-nextver "2.20">
<!ENTITY bz-date "2004-01-24"> <!ENTITY bz-date "2004-07-10">
<!ENTITY % bz-devel "INCLUDE"> <!ENTITY % bz-devel "INCLUDE">
<!ENTITY landfillbase "http://landfill.bugzilla.org/bugzilla-tip/">
<!ENTITY bz "http://www.bugzilla.org/"> <!ENTITY bz "http://www.bugzilla.org/">
<!ENTITY bzg-bugs "<ulink url='http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&amp;component=Documentation'>Bugzilla Documentation</ulink>"> <!ENTITY bzg-bugs "<ulink url='http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&amp;component=Documentation'>Bugzilla Documentation</ulink>">
<!ENTITY mysql "http://www.mysql.com/"> <!ENTITY mysql "http://www.mysql.com/">
<!ENTITY newest-perl-ver "5.8.2"> <!ENTITY newest-perl-ver "5.8.3">
<!-- For minimum versions --> <!-- For minimum versions -->
<!ENTITY min-mysql-ver "3.23.41"> <!ENTITY min-mysql-ver "3.23.41">
<!ENTITY min-perl-ver "5.6.0"> <!ENTITY min-perl-ver "5.6.0">
<!ENTITY min-perl-ver-win "5.8.1">
<!ENTITY min-template-ver "2.08"> <!ENTITY min-template-ver "2.08">
<!ENTITY min-file-temp-ver "any"> <!ENTITY min-file-temp-ver "any">
<!ENTITY min-appconfig-ver "1.52"> <!ENTITY min-appconfig-ver "1.52">
...@@ -50,17 +52,17 @@ ...@@ -50,17 +52,17 @@
<!ENTITY min-file-spec-ver "0.82"> <!ENTITY min-file-spec-ver "0.82">
<!ENTITY min-data-dumper-ver "any"> <!ENTITY min-data-dumper-ver "any">
<!ENTITY min-dbd-mysql-ver "2.1010"> <!ENTITY min-dbd-mysql-ver "2.1010">
<!ENTITY min-dbi-ver "1.32"> <!ENTITY min-dbi-ver "1.36">
<!ENTITY min-date-format-ver "2.21"> <!ENTITY min-date-format-ver "2.21">
<!ENTITY min-cgi-ver "2.93"> <!ENTITY min-cgi-ver "2.93">
<!-- Optional modules --> <!-- Optional modules -->
<!ENTITY min-gd-ver "1.20"> <!ENTITY min-gd-ver "1.20">
<!ENTITY min-gd-graph-ver "any"> <!ENTITY min-gd-graph-ver "any">
<!ENTITY min-gd-text-align-ver "any"> <!ENTITY min-gd-text-align-ver "any">
<!ENTITY min-chart-base-ver "0.99c"> <!ENTITY min-chart-base-ver "1.0">
<!ENTITY min-xml-parser-ver "any"> <!ENTITY min-xml-parser-ver "any">
<!ENTITY min-mime-parser-ver "any"> <!ENTITY min-mime-parser-ver "any">
<!ENTITY min-patchreader-ver "0.9.1"> <!ENTITY min-patchreader-ver "0.9.4">
]> ]>
......
docs/en/xml/administration.xml
View file @ a7d40ecc
...@@ -2,28 +2,13 @@ ...@@ -2,28 +2,13 @@
<chapter id="administration"> <chapter id="administration">
<title>Administering Bugzilla</title> <title>Administering Bugzilla</title>
<subtitle>Or, I just got this cool thing installed. Now what the heck do I <section id="parameters">
do with it?</subtitle> <title>Bugzilla Configuration</title>
<para>So you followed <para>Bugzilla is configured by changing various parameters, accessed
<quote> from the "Edit parameters" link in the page footer. Here are
<xref linkend="installation" /> some of the key parameters on that page. You should run down this
</quote> list and set them appropriately after installing Bugzilla.</para>
to the letter, and logged into Bugzilla for the very first time with your
super-duper god account. You sit, contentedly staring at the Bugzilla Query
Screen, the worst of the whole mad business of installing this terrific
program behind you. It seems, though, you have nothing yet to query! Your
first act of business should be to setup the operating parameters for
Bugzilla so you can get busy getting data into your bug tracker.</para>
<section id="postinstall-check">
<title>Post-Installation Checklist</title>
<para>After installation, follow the checklist below to help ensure that
you have a successful installation. If you do not see a recommended
setting for a parameter, consider leaving it at the default while you
perform your initial tests on your Bugzilla setup.</para>
<indexterm> <indexterm>
<primary>checklist</primary> <primary>checklist</primary>
...@@ -31,185 +16,102 @@ ...@@ -31,185 +16,102 @@
<procedure> <procedure>
<step> <step>
<para>Bring up <para>
<filename>editparams.cgi</filename> <command>maintainer</command>:
The maintainer parameter is the email address of the person
in your web browser. This should be available as the responsible for maintaining this
<quote>edit parameters</quote> Bugzilla installation. The address need not be that of a valid Bugzilla
account.</para>
link from any Bugzilla screen once you have logged in.</para>
</step>
<step>
<para>The
<quote>maintainer</quote>
is the email address of the person responsible for maintaining this
Bugzilla installation. The maintainer need not be a valid Bugzilla
user. Error pages, error emails, and administrative mail will be sent
with the maintainer as the return email address.</para>
<para>Set
<quote>maintainer</quote>
to
<emphasis>your</emphasis>
email address. This allows Bugzilla's error messages to display your
email address and allow people to contact you for help.</para>
</step> </step>
<step> <step>
<para>The <para>
<quote>urlbase</quote> <command>urlbase</command>:
This parameter defines the fully qualified domain name and web
parameter defines the fully qualified domain name and web server path server path to your Bugzilla installation.</para>
to your Bugzilla installation.</para>
<para>For example, if your Bugzilla query page is
<para>For example, if your bugzilla query page is <filename>http://www.foo.com/bugzilla/query.cgi</filename>,
http://www.foo.com/bugzilla/query.cgi, set your set your <quote>urlbase</quote>
<quote>urlbase</quote> to <filename>http://www.foo.com/bugzilla/</filename>.</para>
is http://www.foo.com/bugzilla/.</para>
</step> </step>
<step> <step>
<para> <para>
<quote>usebuggroups</quote> <command>makeproductgroups</command>:
This dictates whether or not to automatically create groups
dictates whether or not to implement group-based security for when new products are created.
Bugzilla. If set, Bugzilla bugs can have an associated groupmask </para>
defining which groups of users are allowed to see and edit the
bug.</para>
<para>Set "usebuggroups" to "on"
<emphasis>only</emphasis>
if you may wish to restrict access to products. I suggest leaving
this parameter
<emphasis>off</emphasis>
while initially testing your Bugzilla.</para>
</step> </step>
<step> <step>
<para> <para>
<quote>usebuggroupsentry</quote> <command>useentrygroupdefault</command>:
Bugzilla products can have a group associated with them, so that
, when set to certain users can only see bugs in certain products. When this
<quote>on</quote> parameter is set to <quote>on</quote>, this
causes the initial group controls on newly created products
, requires that all bugs have an associated groupmask when submitted. to place all newly-created bugs in the group
This parameter is made for those installations where product having the same name as the product immediately.
isolation is a necessity.</para> After a product is initially created, the group controls
can be further adjusted without interference by
<para>Set "usebuggroupsentry" to "on" if you absolutely need to this mechanism.</para>
restrict access to bugs from the moment they are submitted through
resolution. Once again, if you are simply testing your installation,
I suggest against turning this parameter on; the strict security
checking may stop you from being able to modify your new
entries.</para>
</step> </step>
<step> <step>
<para>You run into an interesting problem when Bugzilla reaches a <para>
<command>shadowdb</command>:
You run into an interesting problem when Bugzilla reaches a
high level of continuous activity. MySQL supports only table-level high level of continuous activity. MySQL supports only table-level
write locking. What this means is that if someone needs to make a write locking. What this means is that if someone needs to make a
change to a bug, they will lock the entire table until the operation change to a bug, they will lock the entire table until the operation
is complete. Locking for write also blocks reads until the write is is complete. Locking for write also blocks reads until the write is
complete. The complete. Note that more recent versions of mysql support row level
<quote>shadowdb</quote> locking using different table types. These types are slower than the
standard type, and Bugzilla does not yet take advantage of features
such as transactions which would justify this speed decrease. The
Bugzilla team are, however, happy to hear about any experiences with
row level locking and Bugzilla.</para>
<para>The <quote>shadowdb</quote>
parameter was designed to get around this limitation. While only a parameter was designed to get around this limitation. While only a
single user is allowed to write to a table at a time, reads can single user is allowed to write to a table at a time, reads can
continue unimpeded on a read-only shadow copy of the database. continue unimpeded on a read-only shadow copy of the database.
Although your database size will double, a shadow database can cause Although your database size will double, a shadow database can cause
an enormous performance improvement when implemented on extremely an enormous performance improvement when implemented on extremely
high-traffic Bugzilla databases.</para> high-traffic Bugzilla databases.</para>
<para>Set "shadowdb" to "bug_shadowdb" if you will be running a <para>
*very* large installation of Bugzilla. The shadow database enables As a guide, on reasonably old hardware, mozilla.org began needing
many simultaneous users to read and write to the database without
interfering with one another.
<note>
<para>Enabling "shadowdb" can adversely affect the stability of
your installation of Bugzilla. You should regularly check that your
database is in sync. It is often advisable to force a shadow
database sync nightly via
<quote>cron</quote>
.</para>
</note>
Once again, in testing you should avoid this option -- use it if or
when you
<emphasis>need</emphasis>
to use it, and have repeatedly run into the problem it was designed
to solve -- very long wait times while attempting to commit a change
to the database. Mozilla.org began needing
<quote>shadowdb</quote> <quote>shadowdb</quote>
when they reached around 40,000 Bugzilla users with several hundred when they reached around 40,000 Bugzilla users with several hundred
Bugzilla bug changes and comments per day.</para> Bugzilla bug changes and comments per day.</para>
<para>If you use the "shadowdb" option, it is only natural that you <para>The value of the parameter defines the name of the
should turn the "queryagainstshadowdb" option "On" as well. Otherwise shadow bug database. You will need to set the host and port settings
you are replicating data into a shadow database for no reason!</para> from the params page, and set up replication in your database server
so that updates reach this readonly mirror. Consult your database
documentation for more detail.</para>
</step> </step>
<step> <step>
<para> <para>
<quote>headerhtml</quote> <command>shutdownhtml</command>:
,
<quote>footerhtml</quote>
,
<quote>errorhtml</quote>
,
<quote>bannerhtml</quote>
, and
<quote>blurbhtml</quote>
are all templates which control display of headers, footers, errors,
banners, and additional data. We could go into some detail regarding
the usage of these, but it is really best just to monkey around with
them a bit to see what they do. I strongly recommend you copy your
<filename>data/params</filename>
file somewhere safe before playing with these values, though. If they
are changed dramatically, it may make it impossible for you to
display Bugzilla pages to fix the problem until you have restored
your
<filename>data/params</filename>
file.</para>
<para>If you have custom logos or HTML you must put in place to fit
within your site design guidelines, place the code in the
"headerhtml", "footerhtml", "errorhtml", "bannerhtml", or "blurbhtml"
text boxes.
<note>
<para>The "headerhtml" text box is the HTML printed out
<emphasis>before</emphasis>
any other code on the page, except the CONTENT-TYPE header sent by If you need to shut down Bugzilla to perform administration, enter
the Bugzilla engine. If you have a special banner, put the code for some descriptive HTML here and anyone who tries to use Bugzilla will
it in "bannerhtml". You may want to leave these settings at the receive a page to that effect. Obviously, editparams.cgi will
defaults initially.</para> still be accessible so you can remove the HTML and re-enable Bugzilla.
</note> :-)
</para> </para>
</step> </step>
<step> <step>
<para> <para>
<quote>passwordmail</quote> <command>passwordmail</command>:
is rather simple. Every time a user creates an account, the text of Every time a user creates an account, the text of
this parameter is read as the text to send to the new user along with this parameter (with substitutions) is sent to the new user along with
their password message.</para> their password message.</para>
<para>Add any text you wish to the "passwordmail" parameter box. For <para>Add any text you wish to the "passwordmail" parameter box. For
...@@ -217,47 +119,44 @@ ...@@ -217,47 +119,44 @@
blurb about how to use Bugzilla at your site.</para> blurb about how to use Bugzilla at your site.</para>
</step> </step>
<step> <step>
<para> <para>
<quote>useqacontact</quote> <command>movebugs</command>:
allows you to define an email address for each component, in addition This option is an undocumented feature to allow moving bugs
to that of the default owner, who will be sent carbon copies of between separate Bugzilla installations. You will need to understand
incoming bugs. The critical difference between a QA Contact and an the source code in order to use this feature. Please consult
Owner is that the QA Contact follows the component. If you reassign a <filename>movebugs.pl</filename> in your Bugzilla source tree for
bug from component A to component B, the QA Contact for that bug will further documentation, such as it is.
change with the reassignment, regardless of owner.</para> </para>
</step>
<step>
<para> <para>
<quote>usestatuswhiteboard</quote> <command>useqacontact</command>:
defines whether you wish to have a free-form, overwritable field This allows you to define an email address for each component, in
addition
to that of the default owner, who will be sent carbon copies of
incoming bugs.</para>
</step>
<step>
<para>
<command>usestatuswhiteboard</command>:
This defines whether you wish to have a free-form, overwritable field
associated with each bug. The advantage of the Status Whiteboard is associated with each bug. The advantage of the Status Whiteboard is
that it can be deleted or modified with ease, and provides an that it can be deleted or modified with ease, and provides an
easily-searchable field for indexing some bugs that have some trait easily-searchable field for indexing some bugs that have some trait
in common. Many people will put in common.
<quote>help wanted</quote> </para>
,
<quote>stalled</quote>
, or
<quote>waiting on reply from somebody</quote>
messages into the Status Whiteboard field so those who peruse the
bugs are aware of their status even more than that which can be
indicated by the Resolution fields.</para>
<para>Do you want to use the QA Contact ("useqacontact") and status
whiteboard ("usestatuswhiteboard") fields? These fields are useful
because they allow for more flexibility, particularly when you have
an existing Quality Assurance and/or Release Engineering team, but
they may not be needed for many smaller installations.</para>
</step> </step>
<step> <step>
<para>Set "whinedays" to the amount of days you want to let bugs go <para>
in the "New" or "Reopened" state before notifying people they have <command>whinedays</command>:
Set this to the number of days you want to let bugs go
in the NEW or REOPENED state before notifying people they have
untouched new bugs. If you do not plan to use this feature, simply do untouched new bugs. If you do not plan to use this feature, simply do
not set up the whining cron job described in the installation not set up the whining cron job described in the installation
instructions, or set this value to "0" (never whine).</para> instructions, or set this value to "0" (never whine).</para>
...@@ -265,8 +164,8 @@ ...@@ -265,8 +164,8 @@
<step> <step>
<para> <para>
<quote>commenton</quote> <command>commenton*</command>:
All these
fields allow you to dictate what changes can pass without comment, fields allow you to dictate what changes can pass without comment,
and which must have a comment from the person who changed them. and which must have a comment from the person who changed them.
Often, administrators will allow users to add themselves to the CC Often, administrators will allow users to add themselves to the CC
...@@ -288,30 +187,17 @@ ...@@ -288,30 +187,17 @@
</step> </step>
<step> <step>
<para>The <para>
<quote>supportwatchers</quote> <command>supportwatchers</command>:
option can be an exceptionally powerful tool in the hands of a power Turning on this option allows users to ask to receive copies of
Bugzilla user. By enabling this option, you allow users to receive all a particular other user's bug email. This is, of
email updates whenever other users receive email updates. This is, of
course, subject to the groupset restrictions on the bug; if the course, subject to the groupset restrictions on the bug; if the
<quote>watcher</quote> <quote>watcher</quote>
would not normally be allowed to view a bug, the watcher cannot get would not normally be allowed to view a bug, the watcher cannot get
around the system by setting herself up to watch the bugs of someone around the system by setting herself up to watch the bugs of someone
with bugs outside her privileges. She would still only receive email with bugs outside her privileges. They would still only receive email
updates for those bugs she could normally view.</para> updates for those bugs she could normally view.</para>
<para>For Bugzilla sites which require strong inter-Product security
to prevent snooping, watchers are not a good idea.</para>
<para>However, for most sites you should set
<quote>supportwatchers</quote>
to "On". This feature is helpful for team leads to monitor progress
in their respective areas, and can offer many other benefits, such as
allowing a developer to pick up a former engineer's bugs without
requiring her to change all the information in the bug.</para>
</step> </step>
</procedure> </procedure>
</section> </section>
...@@ -319,120 +205,45 @@ ...@@ -319,120 +205,45 @@
<section id="useradmin"> <section id="useradmin">
<title>User Administration</title> <title>User Administration</title>
<para>User administration is one of the easiest parts of Bugzilla.
Keeping it from getting out of hand, however, can become a
challenge.</para>
<section id="defaultuser"> <section id="defaultuser">
<title>Creating the Default User</title> <title>Creating the Default User</title>
<para>When you first run checksetup.pl after installing Bugzilla, it <para>When you first run checksetup.pl after installing Bugzilla, it
will prompt you for the administrative username (email address) and will prompt you for the administrative username (email address) and
password for this "super user". If for some reason you were to delete password for this "super user". If for some reason you delete
the "super user" account, re-running checksetup.pl will again prompt the "super user" account, re-running checksetup.pl will again prompt
you for this username and password.</para> you for this username and password.</para>
<tip> <tip>
<para>If you wish to add more administrative users, you must use the <para>If you wish to add more administrative users, add them to
MySQL interface. Run "mysql" from the command line, and use these the "admin" group and, optionally, add edit the tweakparams, editusers,
commands ("mysql&gt;" denotes the mysql prompt, not something you creategroups, editcomponents, and editkeywords groups to add the
should type in): entire admin group to those groups.
<command>
<prompt>mysql&gt;</prompt>
use bugs;</command>
<command>
<prompt>mysql&gt;</prompt>
update profiles set groupset=0x7ffffffffffffff where login_name =
"(user's login name)";</command>
</para> </para>
<para>Yes, that is
<emphasis>fourteen</emphasis>
<quote>f</quote>
's. A whole lot of f-ing going on if you want to create a new
administator.</para>
</tip> </tip>
</section> </section>
<section id="manageusers"> <section id="manageusers">
<title>Managing Other Users</title> <title>Managing Other Users</title>
<section id="login">
<title>Logging In</title>
<orderedlist>
<listitem>
<para>Open the index.html page for your Bugzilla installation in
your browser window.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>Click the "Query Existing Bug Reports" link.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>Click the "Log In" link at the foot of the page.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>Type your email address, and the password which was emailed
to you when you created your Bugzilla account, into the spaces
provided.</para>
</listitem>
</orderedlist>
<para>Congratulations, you are logged in!</para>
</section>
<section id="createnewusers"> <section id="createnewusers">
<title>Creating new users</title> <title>Creating new users</title>
<para>Your users can create their own user accounts by clicking the <para>Your users can create their own user accounts by clicking the
"New Account" link at the bottom of each page. However, should you "New Account" link at the bottom of each page (assuming they
aren't logged in as someone else already.) However, should you
desire to create user accounts ahead of time, here is how you do desire to create user accounts ahead of time, here is how you do
it.</para> it.</para>
<orderedlist> <orderedlist>
<listitem> <listitem>
<para>After logging in, click the "Users" link at the footer of <para>After logging in, click the "Users" link at the footer of
the query page.</para> the query page, and then click "Add a new user".</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>To see a specific user, type a portion of their login name
in the box provided and click "submit". To see all users, simply
click the "submit" button. You must click "submit" here to be
able to add a new user.</para>
<tip>
<para>More functionality is available via the list on the
right-hand side of the text entry box. You can match what you
type as a case-insensitive substring (the default) of all users
on your system, a case-sensitive regular expression (please see
the
<command>man regexp</command>
manual page for details on regular expression syntax), or a
<emphasis>reverse</emphasis>
regular expression match, where every user name which does NOT
match the regular expression is selected.</para>
</tip>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>Click the "Add New User" link at the bottom of the user
list</para>
</listitem> </listitem>
<listitem> <listitem>
<para>Fill out the form presented. This page is self-explanatory. <para>Fill out the form presented. This page is self-explanatory.
When done, click "submit".</para> When done, click "Submit".</para>
<note> <note>
<para>Adding a user this way will <para>Adding a user this way will
...@@ -453,84 +264,71 @@ ...@@ -453,84 +264,71 @@
</orderedlist> </orderedlist>
</section> </section>
<section id="disableusers">
<title>Disabling Users</title>
<para>I bet you noticed that big "Disabled Text" entry box available
from the "Add New User" screen, when you edit an account? By entering
any text in this box and selecting "submit", you have prevented the
user from using Bugzilla via the web interface. Your explanation,
written in this text box, will be presented to the user the next time
she attempts to use the system.
<warning>
<para>Don't disable your own administrative account, or you will
hate life!</para>
<para>At this time,
<quote>Disabled Text</quote>
does not prevent a user from using the email interface. If you have
the email interface enabled, they can still continue to submit bugs
and comments that way. We need a patch to fix this.</para>
</warning>
</para>
</section>
<section id="modifyusers"> <section id="modifyusers">
<title>Modifying Users</title> <title>Modifying Users</title>
<para>Here I will attempt to describe the function of each option on <para>To see a specific user, search for their login name
the Edit User screen.</para> in the box provided on the "Edit Users" page. To see all users,
leave the box blank.</para>
<para>You can search in different ways the listbox to the right
of the text entry box. You can match by
case-insensitive substring (the default),
regular expression, or a
<emphasis>reverse</emphasis>
regular expression match, which finds every user name which does NOT
match the regular expression. (Please see
the <command>man regexp</command>
manual page for details on regular expression syntax.)
</para>
<para>Once you have found your user, you can change the following
fields:</para>
<itemizedlist> <itemizedlist>
<listitem> <listitem>
<para> <para>
<emphasis>Login Name</emphasis> <emphasis>Login Name</emphasis>:
This is generally the user's full email address. However, if you
: This is generally the user's email address. However, if you have are using the emailsuffix Param, this may just be the user's
have edited your system parameters, this may just be the user's login name. Note that users can now change their login names
login name or some other identifier. themselves (to any valid email address.)
<tip>
<para>For compatability reasons, you should probably stick with
email addresses as user login names. It will make your life
easier.</para>
</tip>
</para> </para>
</listitem> </listitem>
<listitem> <listitem>
<para> <para>
<emphasis>Real Name</emphasis> <emphasis>Real Name</emphasis>: The user's real name. Note that
Bugzilla does not require this to create an account.</para>
: Duh!</para>
</listitem> </listitem>
<listitem> <listitem>
<para> <para>
<emphasis>Password</emphasis> <emphasis>Password</emphasis>:
You can change the user's password here. Users can automatically
: You can change the user password here. It is normal to only see request a new password, so you shouldn't need to do this often.
asterisks.</para> If you want to disable an account, see Disable Text below.
</para>
</listitem> </listitem>
<listitem> <listitem>
<para> <para>
<emphasis>Disable Text</emphasis> <emphasis>Disable Text</emphasis>:
If you type anything in this box, including just a space, the
: If you type anything in this box, including just a space, the user is prevented from logging in, or making any changes to
user account is disabled from making any changes to bugs via the bugs via the web interface.
web interface, and what you type in this box is presented as the The HTML you type in this box is presented to the user when
reason. they attempt to perform these actions, and should explain
why the account was disabled.
<warning> <warning>
<para>Don't disable the administrator account!</para> <para>Don't disable all the administrator accounts!</para>
</warning> </warning>
<note> <note>
<para>As of this writing, the user can still submit bugs via <para>The user can still submit bugs via
the e-mail gateway, if you set it up, despite the disabled text the e-mail gateway, if you set it up, even if the disabled text
field. The e-mail gateway should field is filled in. The e-mail gateway should
<emphasis>not</emphasis> <emphasis>not</emphasis>
be enabled for secure installations of Bugzilla.</para> be enabled for secure installations of Bugzilla.</para>
</note> </note>
</para> </para>
...@@ -538,830 +336,776 @@ ...@@ -538,830 +336,776 @@
<listitem> <listitem>
<para> <para>
<emphasis>CanConfirm</emphasis> <emphasis>&lt;groupname&gt;</emphasis>:
If you have created some groups, e.g. "securitysensitive", then
: This field is only used if you have enabled "unconfirmed" checkboxes will appear here to allow you to add users to, or
status in your parameters screen. If you enable this for a user, remove them from, these groups.
that user can then move bugs from "Unconfirmed" to "Confirmed" </para>
status (e.g.: "New" status). Be judicious about allowing users to
turn this bit on for other users.</para>
</listitem> </listitem>
<listitem> <listitem>
<para> <para>
<emphasis>Creategroups</emphasis> <emphasis>canconfirm</emphasis>:
This field is only used if you have enabled the "unconfirmed"
: This option will allow a user to create and destroy groups in status. If you enable this for a user,
Bugzilla. Unless you are using the Bugzilla GroupSentry security that user can then move bugs from "Unconfirmed" to a "Confirmed"
option "usebuggroupsentry" in your parameters, this setting has status (e.g.: "New" status).</para>
no effect.</para>
</listitem> </listitem>
<listitem> <listitem>
<para> <para>
<emphasis>Editbugs</emphasis> <emphasis>creategroups</emphasis>:
This option will allow a user to create and destroy groups in
Bugzilla.</para>
</listitem>
: Unless a user has this bit set, they can only edit those bugs <listitem>
for which they are the assignee or the reporter. <para>
<note> <emphasis>editbugs</emphasis>:
<para>Leaving this option unchecked does not prevent users from Unless a user has this bit set, they can only edit those bugs
adding comments to a bug! They simply cannot change a bug for which they are the assignee or the reporter. Even if this
priority, severity, etc. unless they are the assignee or option is unchecked, users can still add comments to bugs.
reporter.</para>
</note>
</para> </para>
</listitem> </listitem>
<listitem> <listitem>
<para> <para>
<emphasis>Editcomponents</emphasis> <emphasis>editcomponents</emphasis>:
This flag allows a user to create new products and components,
: This flag allows a user to create new products and components,
as well as modify and destroy those that have no bugs associated as well as modify and destroy those that have no bugs associated
with them. If a product or component has bugs associated with it, with them. If a product or component has bugs associated with it,
those bugs must be moved to a different product or component those bugs must be moved to a different product or component
before Bugzilla will allow them to be destroyed. The name of a before Bugzilla will allow them to be destroyed.
product or component can be changed without affecting the </para>
associated bugs, but it tends to annoy the hell out of your users
when these change a lot.</para>
</listitem> </listitem>
<listitem> <listitem>
<para> <para>
<emphasis>Editkeywords</emphasis> <emphasis>editkeywords</emphasis>:
If you use Bugzilla's keyword functionality, enabling this
: If you use Bugzilla's keyword functionality, enabling this feature allows a user to create and destroy keywords. As always,
feature allows a user can create and destroy keywords. As always,
the keywords for existing bugs containing the keyword the user the keywords for existing bugs containing the keyword the user
wishes to destroy must be changed before Bugzilla will allow it wishes to destroy must be changed before Bugzilla will allow it
to die. You must be very careful about creating too many new to die.</para>
keywords if you run a very large Bugzilla installation; keywords
are global variables across products, and you can often run into
a phenomenon called "keyword bloat". This confuses users, and
then the feature goes unused.</para>
</listitem> </listitem>
<listitem> <listitem>
<para> <para>
<emphasis>Editusers</emphasis> <emphasis>editusers</emphasis>:
This flag allows a user to do what you're doing right now: edit
: This flag allows a user do what you're doing right now: edit
other users. This will allow those with the right to do so to other users. This will allow those with the right to do so to
remove administrator privileges from other users or grant them to remove administrator privileges from other users or grant them to
themselves. Enable with care.</para> themselves. Enable with care.</para>
</listitem> </listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
<emphasis>tweakparams</emphasis>:
This flag allows a user to change Bugzilla's Params
(using <filename>editparams.cgi</filename>.)</para>
</listitem>
<listitem> <listitem>
<para> <para>
<emphasis>PRODUCT</emphasis> <emphasis>&lt;productname&gt;</emphasis>:
This allows an administrator to specify the products in which
: PRODUCT bugs access. This allows an administrator, with a user can see bugs. The user must still have the
product-level granularity, to specify in which products a user "editbugs" privilege to edit bugs in these products.</para>
can edit bugs. The user must still have the "editbugs" privelege
to edit bugs in this area; this simply restricts them from even
seeing bugs outside these boundaries if the administrator has
enabled the group sentry parameter "usebuggroupsentry". Unless
you are using bug groups, this option has no effect.</para>
</listitem> </listitem>
</itemizedlist> </itemizedlist>
</section> </section>
</section> </section>
</section> </section>
<section id="programadmin"> <section id="products">
<title>Product, Component, Milestone, and Version Administration</title> <title>Products</title>
<epigraph> <para>
<para>Dear Lord, we have to get our users to do WHAT?</para> <glossterm linkend="gloss-product" baseform="product">
</epigraph> Products</glossterm>
<section id="products"> are the broadest category in Bugzilla, and tend to represent real-world
<title>Products</title> shipping products. E.g. if your company makes computer games,
you should have one product per game, perhaps a "Common" product for
units of technology used in multiple games, and maybe a few special
products (Website, Administration...)</para>
<subtitle>Formerly, and in some spots still, called <para>Many of Bugzilla's settings are configurable on a per-product
"Programs"</subtitle> basis. The number of "votes" available to users is set per-product,
as is the number of votes
required to move a bug automatically from the UNCONFIRMED status to the
NEW status.</para>
<para> <para>To create a new product:</para>
<glossterm linkend="gloss-product" baseform="product">
Products</glossterm>
are the broadest category in Bugzilla, and you should have the least of <orderedlist>
these. If your company makes computer games, you should have one <listitem>
product per game, and possibly a few special products (website, <para>Select "products" from the footer</para>
meetings...)</para>
<para>A Product (formerly called "Program", and still referred to that </listitem>
way in some portions of the source code) controls some very important
functions. The number of "votes" available for users to vote for the
most important bugs is set per-product, as is the number of votes
required to move a bug automatically from the UNCONFIRMED status to the
NEW status. One can close a Product for further bug entry and define
various Versions available from the Edit product screen.</para>
<para>To create a new product:</para> <listitem>
<para>Select the "Add" link in the bottom right</para>
</listitem>
<orderedlist> <listitem>
<listitem> <para>Enter the name of the product and a description. The
<para>Select "components" from the yellow footer</para> Description field may contain HTML.</para>
</listitem>
</orderedlist>
<tip> <para>Don't worry about the "Closed for bug entry", "Maximum Votes
<para>It may seem counterintuitive to click "components" when you per person", "Maximum votes a person can put on a single bug",
want to edit the properties associated with Products. This is one "Number of votes a bug in this Product needs to automatically get out
of a long list of things we want in Bugzilla 3.0...</para> of the UNCOMFIRMED state", and "Version" options yet. We'll cover
</tip> those in a few moments.
</listitem> </para>
</section>
<listitem> <section id="components">
<para>Select the "Add" link to the right of "Add a new <title>Components</title>
product".</para>
</listitem> <para>Components are subsections of a Product. E.g. the computer game
you are designing may have a "UI"
component, an "API" component, a "Sound System" component, and a
"Plugins" component, each overseen by a different programmer. It
often makes sense to divide Components in Bugzilla according to the
natural divisions of responsibility within your Product or
company.</para>
<para>
Each component has a owner and (if you turned it on in the parameters),
a QA Contact. The owner should be the primary person who fixes bugs in
that component. The QA Contact should be the person who will ensure
these bugs are completely fixed. The Owner, QA Contact, and Reporter
will get email when new bugs are created in this Component and when
these bugs change. Default Owner and Default QA Contact fields only
dictate the
<emphasis>default assignments</emphasis>;
these can be changed on bug submission, or at any later point in
a bug's life.</para>
<para>To create a new Component:</para>
<listitem> <orderedlist>
<para>Enter the name of the product and a description. The <listitem>
Description field is free-form.</para> <para>Select the "Edit components" link from the "Edit product"
</listitem> page</para>
</orderedlist> </listitem>
<tip> <listitem>
<para>Don't worry about the "Closed for bug entry", "Maximum Votes <para>Select the "Add" link in the bottom right.</para>
per person", "Maximum votes a person can put on a single bug", </listitem>
"Number of votes a bug in this Product needs to automatically get out
of the UNCOMFIRMED state", and "Version" options yet. We'll cover
those in a few moments.</para>
</tip>
</section>
<section id="components"> <listitem>
<title>Components</title> <para>Fill out the "Component" field, a short "Description",
the "Initial Owner" and "Initial QA Contact" (if enabled.)
<para>Components are subsections of a Product. The Component and Description fields may contain HTML;
<example> the "Initial Owner" field must be a login name
<title>Creating some Components</title> already existing in the database.
</para>
<informalexample> </listitem>
<para>The computer game you are designing may have a "UI" </orderedlist>
component, an "API" component, a "Sound System" component, and a </section>
"Plugins" component, each overseen by a different programmer. It
often makes sense to divide Components in Bugzilla according to the
natural divisions of responsibility within your Product or
company.</para>
</informalexample>
</example>
Each component has a owner and (if you turned it on in the parameters),
a QA Contact. The owner should be the primary person who fixes bugs in
that component. The QA Contact should be the person who will ensure
these bugs are completely fixed. The Owner, QA Contact, and Reporter
will get email when new bugs are created in this Component and when
these bugs change. Default Owner and Default QA Contact fields only
dictate the
<emphasis>default assignments</emphasis>
; the Owner and QA Contact fields in a bug are otherwise unrelated to
the Component.</para>
<para>To create a new Component:</para>
<orderedlist> <section id="versions">
<listitem> <title>Versions</title>
<para>Select the "Edit components" link from the "Edit product"
page</para>
</listitem>
<listitem> <para>Versions are the revisions of the product, such as "Flinders
<para>Select the "Add" link to the right of the "Add a new 3.1", "Flinders 95", and "Flinders 2000". Version is not a multi-select
component" text on the "Select Component" page.</para> field; the usual practice is to select the earliest version known to have
</listitem> the bug.
</para>
<listitem> <para>To create and edit Versions:</para>
<para>Fill out the "Component" field, a short "Description", and
the "Initial Owner". The Component and Description fields are
free-form; the "Initial Owner" field must be that of a user ID
already existing in the database. If the initial owner does not
exist, Bugzilla will refuse to create the component.
<tip>
<para>Is your "Default Owner" a user who is not yet in the
database? No problem.
<orderedlist>
<listitem>
<para>Select the "Log out" link on the footer of the
page.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>Select the "New Account" link on the footer of the
"Relogin" page</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>Type in the email address of the default owner you want
to create in the "E-mail address" field, and her full name in
the "Real name" field, then select the "Submit Query"
button.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>Now select "Log in" again, type in your login
information, and you can modify the product to use the
Default Owner information you require.</para>
</listitem>
</orderedlist>
</para>
</tip>
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem> <orderedlist>
<para>Either Edit more components or return to the Bugzilla Query <listitem>
Page. To return to the Product you were editing, you must select <para>From the "Edit product" screen, select "Edit Versions"</para>
the Components link as before.</para> </listitem>
</listitem>
</orderedlist>
</section>
<section id="versions"> <listitem>
<title>Versions</title> <para>You will notice that the product already has the default
version "undefined". Click the "Add" link in the bottom right.</para>
<para>Versions are the revisions of the product, such as "Flinders </listitem>
3.1", "Flinders 95", and "Flinders 2000". Using Versions helps you
isolate code changes and are an aid in reporting. <listitem>
<example> <para>Enter the name of the Version. This field takes text only.
<title>Common Use of Versions</title> Then click the "Add" button.</para>
</listitem>
<informalexample>
<para>A user reports a bug against Version "Beta 2.0" of your </orderedlist>
product. The current Version of your software is "Release Candidate </section>
1", and no longer has the bug. This will help you triage and
classify bugs according to their relevance. It is also possible <section id="milestones">
people may report bugs against bleeding-edge beta versions that are <title>Milestones</title>
not evident in older versions of the software. This can help
isolate code changes that caused the bug</para> <para>Milestones are "targets" that you plan to get a bug fixed by. For
</informalexample> example, you have a bug that you plan to fix for your 3.0 release, it
</example> would be assigned the milestone of 3.0.</para>
<example> <note>
<title>A Different Use of Versions</title> <para>Milestone options will only appear for a Product if you turned
on the "usetargetmilestone" Param in the "Edit Parameters" screen.
<informalexample>
<para>This field has been used to good effect by an online service
provider in a slightly different way. They had three versions of
the product: "Production", "QA", and "Dev". Although it may be the
same product, a bug in the development environment is not normally
as critical as a Production bug, nor does it need to be reported
publicly. When used in conjunction with Target Milestones, one can
easily specify the environment where a bug can be reproduced, and
the Milestone by which it will be fixed.</para>
</informalexample>
</example>
</para> </para>
</note>
<para>To create and edit Versions:</para> <para>To create new Milestones, set Default Milestones, and set
Milestone URL:</para>
<orderedlist> <orderedlist>
<listitem> <listitem>
<para>From the "Edit product" screen, select "Edit Versions"</para> <para>Select "Edit milestones" from the "Edit product" page.</para>
</listitem> </listitem>
<listitem> <listitem>
<para>You will notice that the product already has the default <para>Select "Add" in the bottom right corner.
version "undefined". If your product doesn't use version numbers, text</para>
you may want to leave this as it is or edit it so that it is "---". </listitem>
You can then go back to the edit versions page and add new versions
to your product.</para>
<para>Otherwise, click the "Add" button to the right of the "Add a
new version" text.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem> <listitem>
<para>Enter the name of the Version. This can be free-form <para>Enter the name of the Milestone in the "Milestone" field. You
characters up to the limit of the text box. Then select the "Add" can optionally set the "sortkey", which is a positive or negative
button.</para> number (-255 to 255) that defines where in the list this particular
</listitem> milestone appears. This is because milestones often do not
occur in alphanumeric order For example, "Future" might be
after "Release 1.2". Select "Add".</para>
</listitem>
<listitem> <listitem>
<para>At this point you can select "Edit" to edit more Versions, or <para>From the Edit product screen, you can enter the URL of a
return to the "Query" page, from which you can navigate back to the page which gives information about your milestones and what
product through the "components" link at the foot of the Query they mean. </para>
page.</para> </listitem>
</listitem> </orderedlist>
</orderedlist> </section>
</section>
<section id="voting">
<title>Voting</title>
<section id="milestones"> <para>Voting allows users to be given a pot of votes which they can allocate
<title>Milestones</title> to bugs, to indicate that they'd like them fixed.
This allows developers to gauge
user need for a particular enhancement or bugfix. By allowing bugs with
a certain number of votes to automatically move from "UNCONFIRMED" to
"NEW", users of the bug system can help high-priority bugs garner
attention so they don't sit for a long time awaiting triage.</para>
<para>Milestones are "targets" that you plan to get a bug fixed by. For <para>To modify Voting settings:</para>
example, you have a bug that you plan to fix for your 3.0 release, it
would be assigned the milestone of 3.0. Or, you have a bug that you
plan to fix for 2.8, this would have a milestone of 2.8.</para>
<note> <orderedlist>
<para>Milestone options will only appear for a Product if you turned <listitem>
the "usetargetmilestone" field in the "Edit Parameters" screen <para>Navigate to the "Edit product" screen for the Product you
"On".</para> wish to modify</para>
</note> </listitem>
<para>To create new Milestones, set Default Milestones, and set <listitem>
Milestone URL:</para> <para><emphasis>Maximum Votes per person</emphasis>:
Setting this field to "0" disables voting.</para>
</listitem>
<orderedlist> <listitem>
<listitem> <para><emphasis>Maximum Votes a person can put on a single
<para>Select "edit milestones"</para> bug</emphasis>:
</listitem> It should probably be some number lower than the
"Maximum votes per person". Don't set this field to "0" if
"Maximum votes per person" is non-zero; that doesn't make
any sense.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para><emphasis>Number of votes a bug in this product needs to
automatically get out of the UNCONFIRMED state</emphasis>:
Setting this field to "0" disables the automatic move of
bugs from UNCONFIRMED to NEW.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>Once you have adjusted the values to your preference, click
"Update".</para>
</listitem>
</orderedlist>
</section>
<section id="quips">
<title>Quips</title>
<para>
Quips are small text messages that can be configured to appear
next to search results. A Bugzilla installation can have its own specific
quips. Whenever a quip needs to be displayed, a random selection
is made from the pool of already existing quips.
</para>
<para>
Quips are controlled by the <emphasis>enablequips</emphasis> parameter.
It has several possible values: on, approved, frozen or off.
In order to enable quips approval you need to set this parameter
to "approved". In this way, users are free to submit quips for
addition but an administrator must explicitly approve them before
they are actually used.
</para>
<para>
In order to see the user interface for the quips, it is enough to click
on a quip when it is displayed together with the search results. Or
it can be seen directly in the browser by visiting the quips.cgi URL
(prefixed with the usual web location of the Bugzilla installation).
Once the quip interface is displayed, it is enough to click the
"view and edit the whole quip list" in order to see the administration
page. A page with all the quips available in the database will
be displayed.
</para>
<para>
Next to each tip there is a checkbox, under the
"Approved" column. Quips who have this checkbox checked are
already approved and will appear next to the search results.
The ones that have it unchecked are still preserved in the
database but they will not appear on search results pages.
User submitted quips have initially the checkbox unchecked.
</para>
<para>
Also, there is a delete link next to each quip,
which can be used in order to permanently delete a quip.
</para>
</section>
<section id="groups">
<title>Groups and Group Security</title>
<para>Groups allow the administrator
to isolate bugs or products that should only be seen by certain people.
The association between products and groups is controlled from
the product edit page under <quote>Edit Group Controls.</quote>
</para>
<para>
If the makeproductgroups param is on, a new group will be automatically
created for every new product. It is primarily available for backward
compatibility with older sites.
</para>
<para>
Note that group permissions are such that you need to be a member
of <emphasis>all</emphasis> the groups a bug is in, for whatever
reason, to see that bug. Similarly, you must be a member
of <emphasis>all</emphasis> of the entry groups for a product
to add bugs to a product and you must be a member
of <emphasis>all</emphasis> of the canedit groups for a product
in order to make <emphasis>any</emphasis> change to bugs in that
product.
</para>
<section>
<title>Creating Groups</title>
<para>To create Groups:</para>
<orderedlist>
<listitem> <listitem>
<para>Select "Add" to the right of the "Add a new milestone" <para>Select the <quote>groups</quote>
text</para> link in the footer.</para>
</listitem> </listitem>
<listitem> <listitem>
<para>Enter the name of the Milestone in the "Milestone" field. You <para>Take a moment to understand the instructions on the <quote>Edit
can optionally set the "Sortkey", which is a positive or negative Groups</quote> screen, then select the <quote>Add Group</quote> link.</para>
number (-255 to 255) that defines where in the list this particular
milestone appears. Select "Add".</para>
<example>
<title>Using SortKey with Target Milestone</title>
<informalexample>
<para>Let's say you create a target milestone called "Release
1.0", with Sortkey set to "0". Later, you realize that you will
have a public beta, called "Beta1". You can create a Milestone
called "Beta1", with a Sortkey of "-1" in order to ensure
people will see the Target Milestone of "Beta1" earlier on the
list than "Release 1.0"</para>
</informalexample>
</example>
</listitem> </listitem>
<listitem> <listitem>
<para>If you want to add more milestones, select the "Edit" link. <para>Fill out the <quote>Group</quote>, <quote>Description</quote>,
If you don't, well shoot, you have to go back to the "query" page and <quote>User RegExp</quote> fields.
and select "components" again, and make your way back to the <quote>User RegExp</quote> allows you to automatically
Product you were editing. place all users who fulfill the Regular Expression into the new group.
<note> When you have finished, click <quote>Add</quote>.</para>
<para>This is another in the list of unusual user interface <para>Users whose email addresses match the regular expression
decisions that we'd like to get cleaned up. Shouldn't there be a will automatically be members of the group as long as their
link to the effect of "edit the Product I was editing when I email addresses continue to match the regular expression.</para>
ended up here"? In any case, clicking "components" in the footer <note>
takes you back to the "Select product" screen, from which you can <para>This is a change from 2.16 where the regular expression
begin editing your product again.</para> resulted in a user acquiring permanent membership in a group.
</note> To remove a user from a group the user was in due to a regular
</para> expression in version 2.16 or earlier, the user must be explicitly
removed from the group.</para>
</note>
<warning>
<para>If specifying a domain in the regexp, make sure you end
the regexp with a $. Otherwise, when granting access to
"@mycompany\.com", you will allow access to
'badperson@mycompany.com.cracker.net'. You need to use
'@mycompany\.com$' as the regexp.</para>
</warning>
</listitem> </listitem>
<listitem> <listitem>
<para>From the Edit product screen again (once you've made your way <para>If you plan to use this group to directly control
back), enter the URL for a description of what your milestones are access to bugs, check the "use for bugs" box. Groups
for this product in the "Milestone URL" field. It should be of the not used for bugs are still useful because other groups
format "http://www.foo.com/bugzilla/product_milestones.html"</para> can include the group as a whole.</para>
<para>Some common uses of this field include product descriptions,
product roadmaps, and of course a simple description of the meaning
of each milestone.</para>
</listitem> </listitem>
<listitem> <listitem>
<para>If you're using Target Milestones, the "Default Milestone" <para>After you add your new group, edit the new group. On the
field must have some kind of entry. If you really don't care if edit page, you can specify other groups that should be included
people set coherent Target Milestones, simply leave this at the in this group and which groups should be permitted to add and delete
default, "---". However, controlling and regularly updating the users from this group.</para>
Default Milestone field is a powerful tool when reporting the
status of projects.</para>
<para>Select the "Update" button when you are done.</para>
</listitem> </listitem>
</orderedlist> </orderedlist>
</section> </section>
<section>
<section id="voting"> <title>Assigning Users to Groups</title>
<title>Voting</title> <para>Users can become a member of a group in several ways.</para>
<para>The concept of "voting" is a poorly understood, yet powerful
feature for the management of open-source projects. Each user is
assigned so many Votes per product, which they can freely reassign (or
assign multiple votes to a single bug). This allows developers to gauge
user need for a particular enhancement or bugfix. By allowing bugs with
a certain number of votes to automatically move from "UNCONFIRMED" to
"NEW", users of the bug system can help high-priority bugs garner
attention so they don't sit for a long time awaiting triage.</para>
<para>The daunting challenge of Votes is deciding where you draw the
line for a "vocal majority". If you only have a user base of 100 users,
setting a low threshold for bugs to move from UNCONFIRMED to NEW makes
sense. As the Bugzilla user base expands, however, these thresholds
must be re-evaluated. You should gauge whether this feature is worth
the time and close monitoring involved, and perhaps forego
implementation until you have a critical mass of users who demand
it.</para>
<para>To modify Voting settings:</para>
<orderedlist> <orderedlist>
<listitem> <listitem>
<para>Navigate to the "Edit product" screen for the Product you <para>The user can be explicitly placed in the group by editing
wish to modify</para> the user's own profile</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>Set "Maximum Votes per person" to your calculated value.
Setting this field to "0" disables voting.</para>
</listitem> </listitem>
<listitem> <listitem>
<para>Set "Maximum Votes a person can put on a single bug" to your <para>The group can include another group of which the user is
calculated value. It should probably be some number lower than the a member.</para>
"Maximum votes per person". Setting this field to "0" disables
voting, but leaves the voting options open to the user. This is
confusing.</para>
</listitem> </listitem>
<listitem> <listitem>
<para>Set "Number of votes a bug in this product needs to <para>The user's email address can match a regular expression
automatically get out of the UNCONFIRMED state" to your calculated that the group specifies to automatically grant membership to
number. Setting this field to "0" disables the automatic move of the group.</para>
bugs from UNCONFIRMED to NEW. Some people advocate leaving this at
"0", but of what use are Votes if your Bugzilla user base is unable
to affect which bugs appear on Development radar?
<tip>
<para>You should probably set this number to higher than a small
coalition of Bugzilla users can influence it. Most sites use this
as a "referendum" mechanism -- if users are able to vote a bug
out of UNCONFIRMED, it is a
<emphasis>really</emphasis>
bad bug!</para>
</tip>
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>Once you have adjusted the values to your preference, select
the "Update" button.</para>
</listitem> </listitem>
</orderedlist> </orderedlist>
</section> </section>
<section id="groups"> <section>
<title>Groups and Group Security</title> <title>Assigning Group Controls to Products</title>
<para>
<para>Groups can be very useful in bugzilla, because they allow users On the product edit page, there is a page to edit the
to isolate bugs or products that should only be seen by certain people. <quote>Group Controls</quote>
Groups can also be a complicated minefield of interdependencies and for a product. This allows you to
weirdness if mismanaged. configure how a group relates to the product.
<example> Groups may be applicable, default,
<title>When to Use Group Security</title> and mandatory as well as used to control entry
or used to make bugs in the product
<informalexample> totally read-only unless the group restrictions are met.
<para>Many Bugzilla sites isolate "Security-related" bugs from all </para>
other bugs. This way, they can have a fix ready before the security
vulnerability is announced to the world. You can create a <para>
"Security" product which, by default, has no members, and only add For each group, it is possible to specify if membership in that
members to the group (in their individual User page, as described group is...
under User Administration) who should have priveleged access to </para>
"Security" bugs. Alternately, you may create a Group independently
of any Product, and change the Group mask on individual bugs to
restrict access to members only of certain Groups.</para>
</informalexample>
</example>
Groups only work if you enable the "usebuggroups" paramater. In
addition, if the "usebuggroupsentry" parameter is "On", one can
restrict access to products by groups, so that only members of a
product group are able to view bugs within that product. Group security
in Bugzilla can be divided into two categories: Generic and
Product-Based.</para>
<note>
<para>Groups in Bugzilla are a complicated beast that evolved out of
very simple user permission bitmasks, apparently itself derived from
common concepts in UNIX access controls. A "bitmask" is a
fixed-length number whose value can describe one, and only one, set
of states. For instance, UNIX file permissions are assigned bitmask
values: "execute" has a value of 1, "write" has a value of 2, and
"read" has a value of 4. Add them together, and a file can be read,
written to, and executed if it has a bitmask of "7". (This is a
simplified example -- anybody who knows UNIX security knows there is
much more to it than this. Please bear with me for the purpose of
this note.) The only way a bitmask scheme can work is by doubling the
bit count for each value. Thus if UNIX wanted to offer another file
permission, the next would have to be a value of 8, then the next 16,
the next 32, etc.</para>
<para>Similarly, Bugzilla offers a bitmask to define group
permissions, with an internal limit of 64. Several are already
occupied by built-in permissions. The way around this limitation is
to avoid assigning groups to products if you have many products,
avoid bloating of group lists, and religiously prune irrelevant
groups. In reality, most installations of Bugzilla support far fewer
than 64 groups, so this limitation has not hit for most sites, but it
is on the table to be revised for Bugzilla 3.0 because it interferes
with the security schemes of some administrators.</para>
</note>
<para>To enable Generic Group Security ("usebuggroups"):</para>
<orderedlist> <orderedlist>
<listitem> <listitem>
<para>Turn "On" "usebuggroups" in the "Edit Parameters" <para>
screen.</para> required for bug entry,
</para>
</listitem> </listitem>
<listitem> <listitem>
<para>You will generally have no groups set up. Select the "groups" <para>
link in the footer.</para> Not applicable to this product(NA),
a possible restriction for a member of the
group to place on a bug in this product(Shown),
a default restriction for a member of the
group to place on a bug in this product(Default),
or a mandatory restriction to be placed on bugs
in this product(Mandatory).
</para>
</listitem> </listitem>
<listitem> <listitem>
<para>Take a moment to understand the instructions on the "Edit <para>
Groups" screen. Once you feel confident you understand what is Not applicable by non-members to this product(NA),
expected of you, select the "Add Group" link.</para> a possible restriction for a non-member of the
group to place on a bug in this product(Shown),
a default restriction for a non-member of the
group to place on a bug in this product(Default),
or a mandatory restriction to be placed on bugs
in this product when entered by a non-member(Mandatory).
</para>
</listitem> </listitem>
<listitem> <listitem>
<para>Fill out the "New Name" (remember, no spaces!), "New <para>
Description", and "New User RegExp" fields. "New User RegExp" required in order to make <emphasis>any</emphasis> change
allows you to automatically place all users who fulfill the Regular to bugs in this product <emphasis>including comments.</emphasis>
Expression into the new group. </para>
<example>
<title>Creating a New Group</title>
<informalexample>
<para>I created a group called DefaultGroup with a description
of
<quote>This is simply a group to play with</quote>
, and a New User RegExp of
<quote>.*@mydomain.tld</quote>
. This new group automatically includes all Bugzilla users with
"@mydomain.tld" at the end of their user id. When I finished,
my new group was assigned bit #128.</para>
</informalexample>
</example>
When you have finished, select the Add button.</para>
</listitem> </listitem>
</orderedlist> </orderedlist>
<para>These controls are often described in this order, so a
<para>To enable Product-Based Group Security product that requires a user to be a member of group "foo"
(usebuggroupsentry):</para> to enter a bug and then requires that the bug stay resticted
to group "foo" at all times and that only members of group "foo"
<warning> can edit the bug even if they otherwise could see the bug would
<para>Don't forget that you only have 64 groups masks available, have its controls summarized by...</para>
total, for your installation of Bugzilla! If you plan on having more <programlisting>
than 50 products in your individual Bugzilla installation, and foo: ENTRY, MANDATORY/MANDATORY, CANEDIT
require group security for your products, you should consider either </programlisting>
running multiple Bugzillas or using Generic Group Security instead of
Product-Based ("usebuggroupsentry") Group Security.</para> </section>
</warning> <section>
<title>Common Applications of Group Controls</title>
<section>
<title>General User Access With Security Group</title>
<para>To permit any user to file bugs in each product (A, B, C...)
and to permit any user to submit those bugs into a security
group....</para>
<programlisting>
Product A...
security: SHOWN/SHOWN
Product B...
security: SHOWN/SHOWN
Product C...
security: SHOWN/SHOWN
</programlisting>
</section>
<section>
<title>General User Access With A Security Product</title>
<para>To permit any user to file bugs in a Security product
while keeping those bugs from becoming visible to anyone
outside the securityworkers group unless a member of the
securityworkers group removes that restriction....</para>
<programlisting>
Product Security...
securityworkers: DEFAULT/MANDATORY
</programlisting>
</section>
<section>
<title>Product Isolation With Common Group</title>
<para>To permit users of product A to access the bugs for
product A, users of product B to access product B, and support
staff to access both, 3 groups are needed</para>
<orderedlist> <orderedlist>
<listitem> <listitem>
<para>Turn "On" "usebuggroups" and "usebuggroupsentry" in the "Edit <para>Support: Contains members of the support staff.</para>
Parameters" screen.</para>
<warning>
<para>"usebuggroupsentry" has the capacity to prevent the
administrative user from directly altering bugs because of
conflicting group permissions. If you plan on using
"usebuggroupsentry", you should plan on restricting
administrative account usage to administrative duties only. In
other words, manage bugs with an unpriveleged user account, and
manage users, groups, Products, etc. with the administrative
account.</para>
</warning>
</listitem> </listitem>
<listitem> <listitem>
<para>You will generally have no Groups set up, unless you enabled <para>AccessA: Contains users of product A and the Support group.</para>
"usebuggroupsentry" prior to creating any Products. To create </listitem>
"Generic Group Security" groups, follow the instructions given <listitem>
above. To create Product-Based Group security, simply follow the <para>AccessB: Contains users of product B and the Support group.</para>
instructions for creating a new Product. If you need to add users
to these new groups as you create them, you will find the option to
add them to the group available under the "Edit User"
screens.</para>
</listitem> </listitem>
</orderedlist> </orderedlist>
<para>Once these 3 groups are defined, the products group controls
<para>You may find this example illustrative for how bug groups work. can be set to..</para>
<example> <programlisting>
<title>Bugzilla Groups</title> Product A...
AccessA: ENTRY, MANDATORY/MANDATORY
<literallayout>Bugzilla Groups example ----------------------- For Product B...
this example, let us suppose we have four groups, call them Group1, AccessB: ENTRY, MANDATORY/MANDATORY
Group2, Group3, and Group4. We have 5 users, User1, User2, User3, </programlisting>
User4, User5. We have 8 bugs, Bug1, ..., Bug8. Group membership is <para>Optionally, the support group could be permitted to make
defined by this chart: (X denotes that user is in that group.) (I bugs inaccessible to the users and could be permitted to publish
apologize for the nasty formatting of this table. Try viewing it in a bugs relevant to all users in a common product that is read-only
text-based browser or something for now. -MPB) G G G G r r r r o o o to anyone outside the support group. That configuration could
o u u u u p p p p 1 2 3 4 +-+-+-+-+ User1|X| | | | +-+-+-+-+ User2| be...</para>
|X| | | +-+-+-+-+ User3|X| |X| | +-+-+-+-+ User4|X|X|X| | +-+-+-+-+ <programlisting>
User5| | | | | +-+-+-+-+ Bug restrictions are defined by this chart: Product A...
(X denotes that bug is restricted to that group.) G G G G r r r r o o AccessA: ENTRY, MANDATORY/MANDATORY
o o u u u u p p p p 1 2 3 4 +-+-+-+-+ Bug1| | | | | +-+-+-+-+ Bug2| Support: SHOWN/NA
|X| | | +-+-+-+-+ Bug3| | |X| | +-+-+-+-+ Bug4| | | |X| +-+-+-+-+ Product B...
Bug5|X|X| | | +-+-+-+-+ Bug6|X| |X| | +-+-+-+-+ Bug7|X|X|X| | AccessB: ENTRY, MANDATORY/MANDATORY
+-+-+-+-+ Bug8|X|X|X|X| +-+-+-+-+ Who can see each bug? Bug1 has no Support: SHOWN/NA
group restrictions. Therefore, Bug1 can be seen by any user, whatever Product Common...
their group membership. This is going to be the only bug that User5 Support: ENTRY, DEFAULT/MANDATORY, CANEDIT
can see, because User5 isn't in any groups. Bug2 can be seen by </programlisting>
anyone in Group2, that is User2 and User4. Bug3 can be seen by anyone </section>
in Group3, that is User3 and User4. Bug4 can be seen by anyone in
Group4. Nobody is in Group4, so none of these users can see Bug4.
Bug5 can be seen by anyone who is in _both_ Group1 and Group2. This
is only User4. User1 cannot see it because he is not in Group2, and
User2 cannot see it because she is not in Group1. Bug6 can be seen by
anyone who is in both Group1 and Group3. This would include User3 and
User4. Similar to Bug5, User1 cannot see Bug6 because he is not in
Group3. Bug7 can be seen by anyone who is in Group1, Group2, and
Group3. This is only User4. All of the others are missing at least
one of those group privileges, and thus cannot see the bug. Bug8 can
be seen by anyone who is in Group1, Group2, Group3, and Group4. There
is nobody in all four of these groups, so nobody can see Bug8. It
doesn't matter that User4 is in Group1, Group2, and Group3, since he
isn't in Group4.</literallayout>
</example>
</para>
</section> </section>
</section> </section>
<section id="security"> <section id="upgrading">
<title>Bugzilla Security</title> <title>Upgrading to New Releases</title>
<epigraph> <warning>
<para>Putting your money in a wall safe is better protection than <para>Upgrading is a one-way process. You should backup your database
depending on the fact that no one knows that you hide your money in a and current Bugzilla directory before attempting the upgrade. If you wish
mayonnaise jar in your fridge.</para> to revert to the old Bugzilla version for any reason, you will have to
</epigraph> restore from these backups.
</para>
</warning>
<note> <para>Upgrading Bugzilla is something we all want to do from time to time,
<para>Poorly-configured MySQL, Bugzilla, and FTP installations have be it to get new features or pick up the latest security fix. How easy
given attackers full access to systems in the past. Please take these it is to update depends on a few factors.
guidelines seriously, even for Bugzilla machines hidden away behind </para>
your firewall. 80% of all computer trespassers are insiders, not
anonymous crackers.</para>
</note>
<para>Secure your installation. <itemizedlist>
<note> <listitem>
<para>These instructions must, of necessity, be somewhat vague since <para>If the new version is a revision or a new point release</para>
Bugzilla runs on so many different platforms. If you have refinements </listitem>
of these directions for specific platforms, please submit them to <listitem>
<ulink url="mailto://mozilla-webtools@mozilla.org"> <para>How many, if any, local changes have been made</para>
mozilla-webtools@mozilla.org</ulink> </listitem>
</para> </itemizedlist>
</note>
<para>There are also three different methods to upgrade your installation.
</para>
<orderedlist> <orderedlist>
<listitem> <listitem>
<para>Ensure you are running at least MysQL version 3.22.32 or newer. <para>Using CVS (<xref linkend="upgrade-cvs"/>)</para>
Earlier versions had notable security holes and poorly secured
default configuration choices.</para>
</listitem> </listitem>
<listitem> <listitem>
<para> <para>Downloading a new tarball (<xref linkend="upgrade-tarball"/>)</para>
<emphasis>There is no substitute for understanding the tools on your
system!</emphasis>
Read
<ulink
url="http://www.mysql.com/documentation/mysql/bychapter/manual_Privilege_system.html">
The MySQL Privilege System</ulink>
until you can recite it from memory!</para>
<para>At the very least, ensure you password the "mysql -u root"
account and the "bugs" account, establish grant table rights (consult
the Keystone guide in Appendix C: The Bugzilla Database for some
easy-to-use details) that do not allow CREATE, DROP, RELOAD,
SHUTDOWN, and PROCESS for user "bugs". I wrote up the Keystone advice
back when I knew far less about security than I do now : )</para>
</listitem> </listitem>
<listitem> <listitem>
<para>Lock down /etc/inetd.conf. Heck, disable inet entirely on this <para>Applying the relevant patches (<xref linkend="upgrade-patches"/>)</para>
box. It should only listen to port 25 for Sendmail and port 80 for
Apache.</para>
</listitem> </listitem>
</orderedlist>
<listitem> <para>Which options are available to you may depend on how large a jump
<para>Do not run Apache as you are making and/or your network configuration.
<quote>nobody</quote> </para>
. This will require very lax permissions in your Bugzilla <para>Revisions are normally released to fix security vulnerabilities
directories. Run it, instead, as a user with a name, set via your and are distinguished by an increase in the third number. For example,
httpd.conf file. when 2.16.6 was released, it was a revision to 2.16.5.
<note> </para>
<para>
<quote>nobody</quote>
is a real user on UNIX systems. Having a process run as user id <para>Point releases are normally released when the Bugzilla team feels
<quote>nobody</quote> that there has been a significant amount of progress made between the
last point release and the current time. These are often proceeded by a
stabilization period and release candidates, however the use of
development versions or release candidates is beyond the scope of this
document. Point releases can be distinguished by an increase in the
second number, or minor version. For example, 2.18.0 is a newer point
release than 2.16.5.
</para>
is absolutely no protection against system crackers versus using <para>The examples in this section are written as if you were updating
any other user account. As a general security measure, I recommend to version 2.18.1. The procedures are the same regardless if you are
you create unique user ID's for each daemon running on your system updating to a new point release or a new revision. However, the chance
and, if possible, use "chroot" to jail that process away from the of running into trouble increases when upgrading to a new point release,
rest of your system.</para> escpecially if you've made local changes.
</note> </para>
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem> <para>These examples also assume that your Bugzilla installation is at
<para>Ensure you have adequate access controls for the <filename>/var/www/html/bugzilla</filename>. If that is not the case,
$BUGZILLA_HOME/data/ and $BUGZILLA_HOME/shadow/ directories, as well simply substitute the proper paths where appropriate.
as the $BUGZILLA_HOME/localconfig and $BUGZILLA_HOME/globals.pl </para>
files. The localconfig file stores your "bugs" user password, which
would be terrible to have in the hands of a criminal, while the
"globals.pl" stores some default information regarding your
installation which could aid a system cracker. In addition, some
files under $BUGZILLA_HOME/data/ store sensitive information, and
$BUGZILLA_HOME/shadow/ stores bug information for faster retrieval.
If you fail to secure these directories and this file, you will
expose bug information to those who may not be allowed to see
it.</para>
<note> <example id="upgrade-cvs">
<para>Bugzilla provides default .htaccess files to protect the most <title>Upgrading using CVS</title>
common Apache installations. However, you should verify these are
adequate according to the site-wide security policy of your web
server, and ensure that the .htaccess files are allowed to
"override" default permissions set in your Apache configuration
files. Covering Apache security is beyond the scope of this Guide;
please consult the Apache documentation for details.</para>
<para>If you are using a web server that does not support the
.htaccess control method,
<emphasis>you are at risk!</emphasis>
After installing, check to see if you can view the file
"localconfig" in your web browser (e.g.:
<ulink url="http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/localconfig">
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/localconfig</ulink>
). If you can read the contents of this file, your web server has
not secured your bugzilla directory properly and you must fix this
problem before deploying Bugzilla. If, however, it gives you a
"Forbidden" error, then it probably respects the .htaccess
conventions and you are good to go.</para>
</note>
<para>When you run checksetup.pl, the script will attempt to modify <para>Every release of Bugzilla, whether it is a revision or a point
various permissions on files which Bugzilla uses. If you do not have release, is tagged in CVS. Also, every tarball we have distributed
a webservergroup set in the localconfig file, then Bugzilla will have since version 2.12 has been primed for using CVS. This does, however,
to make certain files world readable and/or writable. require that you are able to access cvs-mirror.mozilla.org on port
<emphasis>THIS IS INSECURE!</emphasis> 2401.
. This means that anyone who can get access to your system can do <tip>
whatever they want to your Bugzilla installation.</para> <para>If you can do this, updating using CVS is probably the most
painless method, especially if you have a lot of local changes.
</para>
</tip>
</para>
<programlisting>
bash$ <command>cd /var/www/html/bugzilla</command>
bash$ <command>cvs login</command>
Logging in to :pserver:anonymous@cvs-mirror.mozilla.org:2401/cvsroot
CVS password: <command>anonymous</command>
bash$ <command>cvs -q update -r BUGZILLA-2_18_1 -dP</command>
P checksetup.pl
P collectstats.pl
P globals.pl
P docs/rel_notes.txt
P template/en/default/list/quips.html.tmpl
</programlisting>
<para>
<caution>
<para>If a line in the output from <command>cvs update</command>
begins with a <computeroutput>C</computeroutput> that represents a
file with local changes that CVS was unable to properly merge. You
need to resolve these conflicts manually before Bugzilla (or at
least the portion using that file) will be usable.
</para>
</caution>
<note> <note>
<para>This also means that if your webserver runs all cgi scripts <para>You also need to run <command>./checksetup.pl</command>
as the same user/group, anyone on the system who can run cgi before your Bugzilla upgrade will be complete.
scripts will be able to take control of your Bugzilla </para>
installation.</para>
</note> </note>
</para>
</example>
<para>On Apache, you can use .htaccess files to protect access to <example id="upgrade-tarball">
these directories, as outlined in <title>Upgrading using the tarball</title>
<ulink url="http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57161">Bug
57161</ulink>
for the localconfig file, and <para>If you are unable or unwilling to use CVS, another option that's
<ulink url="http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65572">Bug always available is to download the latest tarball. This is the most
65572</ulink> difficult option to use, especially if you have local changes.
</para>
for adequate protection in your data/ and shadow/ directories.</para> <programlisting>
bash$ <command>cd /var/www/html</command>
bash$ <command>wget ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/webtools/bugzilla-2.18.1.tar.gz</command>
<emphasis>Output omitted</emphasis>
bash$ <command>tar xzvf bugzilla-2.18.1.tar.gz</command>
bugzilla-2.18.1/
bugzilla-2.18.1/.cvsignore
bugzilla-2.18.1/1x1.gif
<emphasis>Output truncated</emphasis>
bash$ <command>cd bugzilla-2.18.1</command>
bash$ <command>cp ../bugzilla/localconfig* .</command>
bash$ <command>cp -r ../bugzilla/data .</command>
bash$ <command>cd ..</command>
bash$ <command>mv bugzilla bugzilla.old</command>
bash$ <command>mv bugzilla-2.18.1 bugzilla</command>
bash$ <command>cd bugzilla</command>
bash$ <command>./checksetup.pl</command>
<emphasis>Output omitted</emphasis>
</programlisting>
<para>Note the instructions which follow are Apache-specific. If you <para>
use IIS, Netscape, or other non-Apache web servers, please consult <warning>
your system documentation for how to secure these files from being <para>The <command>cp</command> commands both end with periods which
transmitted to curious users.</para> is a very important detail, it tells the shell that the destination
directory is the current working directory. Also, the period at the
beginning of the <command>./checksetup.pl</command> is important and
can not be omitted.
</para>
</warning>
<para>Place the following text into a file named ".htaccess", <note>
readable by your web server, in your $BUGZILLA_HOME/data directory. <para>You will now have to reapply any changes you have made to your
<literallayout>&lt;Files comments&gt; allow from all &lt;/Files&gt; local installation manually.
deny from all</literallayout> </para>
</para> </note>
</para>
</example>
<example id="upgrade-patches">
<title>Upgrading using patches</title>
<para>The Bugzilla team will normally make a patch file available for
revisions to go from the most recent revision to the new one. You could
also read the release notes and grab the patches attached to the
mentioned bug, but it is safer to use the released patch file as
sometimes patches get changed before they get checked in.
It is also theoretically possible to
scour the fixed bug list and pick and choose which patches to apply
from a point release, but this is not recommended either as what you'll
end up with is a hodge podge Bugzilla that isn't really any version.
This would also make it more difficult to upgrade in the future.
</para>
<para>Place the following text into a file named ".htaccess", <programlisting>
readable by your web server, in your $BUGZILLA_HOME/ directory. bash$ <command>cd /var/www/html/bugzilla</command>
<literallayout>&lt;Files localconfig&gt; deny from all &lt;/Files&gt; bash$ <command>wget ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/webtools/bugzilla-2.18.0-to-2.18.1.diff.gz</command>
allow from all</literallayout> <emphasis>Output omitted</emphasis>
</para> bash$ <command>gunzip bugzilla-2.18.0-to-2.18.1.diff.gz</command>
bash$ <command>patch -p1 &lt; bugzilla-2.18.0-to-2.18.1.diff</command>
patching file checksetup.pl
patching file collectstats.pl
patching file globals.pl
</programlisting>
<para>
<caution>
<para>If you do this, beware that this doesn't change the entires in
your <filename id="dir">CVS</filename> directory so it may make
updates using CVS (<xref linkend="upgrade-cvs"/>) more difficult in the
future.
</para>
</caution>
</para>
</example>
<para>Place the following text into a file named ".htaccess",
readable by your web server, in your $BUGZILLA_HOME/shadow directory.
<literallayout>deny from all</literallayout>
</para>
</listitem>
</orderedlist>
</para>
</section> </section>
</chapter> </chapter>
...@@ -1380,7 +1124,7 @@ sgml-local-ecat-files:nil ...@@ -1380,7 +1124,7 @@ sgml-local-ecat-files:nil
sgml-minimize-attributes:nil sgml-minimize-attributes:nil
sgml-namecase-general:t sgml-namecase-general:t
sgml-omittag:t sgml-omittag:t
sgml-parent-document:("Bugzilla-Guide.sgml" "book" "chapter") sgml-parent-document:("Bugzilla-Guide.xml" "book" "chapter")
sgml-shorttag:t sgml-shorttag:t
sgml-tag-region-if-active:t sgml-tag-region-if-active:t
End: End:
......
docs/en/xml/installation.xml
View file @ a7d40ecc
<!-- <!DOCTYPE chapter PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.1.2//EN"> --> <!-- <!DOCTYPE chapter PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.1.2//EN"> -->
<!-- $Id: installation.xml,v 1.74 2008/04/04 06:47:04 bugreport%peshkin.net Exp $ --> <!-- $Id: installation.xml,v 1.75 2008/04/04 06:47:05 justdave%bugzilla.org Exp $ -->
<chapter id="installing-bugzilla"> <chapter id="installing-bugzilla">
<title>Installing Bugzilla</title> <title>Installing Bugzilla</title>
...@@ -54,7 +54,8 @@ ...@@ -54,7 +54,8 @@
<procedure> <procedure>
<step> <step>
<para><link linkend="install-perl">Install Perl</link> <para><link linkend="install-perl">Install Perl</link>
(&min-perl-ver; or above) (&min-perl-ver; or above for non-Windows platforms; &min-perl-ver-win;
for Windows)
</para> </para>
</step> </step>
<step> <step>
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment