Bug 398838: Remove the obsolete Util::value_quote() routine - Patch by FrÃdÃric Buclin <LpSolit@gmail.com> r=mkanat a=LpSolit

Patch By Max Kanat-Alexander <mkanat@bugzilla.org> r=colin.ogilvie, r=vladd, a=justdave

Bug 340226: Util.pm shouldn't depend on Bugzilla::Config - Patch by Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit@gmail.com> r=mkanat a=justdave

Bug 287487: User with no privs can not add comments to bugs that have a deadline field set - Patch by Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit@gmail.com> r=mkanat a=myk

Patch by vladd@bugzilla.org   r=bugzilla@glob.com.au   a=justdave

Permission to do so granted by: justdave, joel, jake, ddk, gerv, bbaetz,
and myself (as gleamed from bonsai and the contributors lines and
indicated in the bug report). a=justdave.

r=justdave
a=justdave

rx2=bbaetz, a=myk (on the condition that we check out the use of the
trilicense later)

test code. Patch makes the tests much better now.

r=zach x2

Don't rely on the TEST_VERBOSE environment variable (no longer exported from runtests.sh) and instead print to the TESTOUT file handle pulled in from Test::More.  This will allow the testing backend to check for verbosity rather than having to handle it in the .t files.

Bug 103664 - Tests should "use strict;" and not contain any tabs.  We should also use the TEST_VERBOSE environment variable instead of VERBOSE.
Patch by David D. Kilzer <ddkilzer@theracingworld.com>
Additional edits by myself to add the emacs mode line.  Also, the change to runtests.sh was done by me.

bug 97976.

No review required for tests at this time. NOT_PART_OF_BUILD

Fix to make the tests generate the list of files to test instead of having to update the list manually whenever a file is added
or removed. The main logic is in t/Support/Files.pm, changes to the test files are needed to allow it to function properly.

NOT_PART_OF_BUILD. No review needed for tests at this time.

Addition of Files.pm which will be used shortly by 1.t (soon to be 1compile.t) which contains the list of files to test. This is important so that we can bring it into other tests which check files for content, etc... 

No review required for tests as of now as per Dave.